history 03 the errors of science
I realized that science could not be proved directly when I supposed that mind had such a structure. We really lived in an illusory world. I was disappointed. But I still thought science was valuable. The real problem was that we had to change our understanding of science. Scientific results were not got directly and could not be proven directly. They were proven by their applications. If the conclusions from science could lead to the result expected when applied to reality, we could say science was scientific enough, though we could not prove science by the process of scientific researching. We also could think science valuable if science could help us to solve the problems of our lives. The original question of the errors of science? It could not be answered directly, it could only be answered by the applications of science.